Skip to main content

How smartIAQ® and the Indoor Air Quality Procedure Unlocked Major Savings for a K-12 HVAC Project

For this large K-12 school project, the engineering team explored value-engineering options to reduce mechanical costs without compromising ventilation quality. By shifting from a traditional Ventilation Rate Procedure (VRP) approach to the Indoor Air Quality Procedure (IAQP) supported by smartIAQ, outdoor air requirements dropped dramatically. This allowed the district to consider the downsizing of multiple DOAS units to achieve substantial first-cost savings.

Case Study

A Texas school district was designing a new building with 20 classrooms and 11 science labs, averaging 1,000 ft2 each. The original mechanical design relied on a series of DOAS systems delivering all required outdoor air, with VRF fan coil units providing heating and cooling but no outdoor air of their own.

Under the Ventilation Rate Procedure, outdoor airflow for these spaces was nearly 20,000 CFM. In a high-enthalpy climate (common in Texas), conditioning volume of outdoor air is costly, energy-intensive, and often pushes HVAC systems beyond feasible or budget-friendly limits. The original design included:

  • Seven DOAS units to meet outdoor air requirements
  • VRF fan coil units for comfort cooling and heating
  • A total estimated DOAS package cost of over $600,000

As the engineering team and district reviewed the budget, they began searching for viable value-engineering options. The most promising pathway was to evaluate whether the Indoor Air Quality Procedure (IAQP) could reduce outdoor air requirements and significantly downsize capacity of multiple DOAS systems.

How K–12 School Saves with IAQP:

  • IAQP reduces required outdoor air volume

  • Design saves $400,000 in projected first cost

  • Meets ASHRAE 62.1 and code requirements

  • Delivers clean air with lower energy use

Ventilation Rate Procedure (VRP) Mechanical Scope

Under VRP, the design required:

  • Nearly 20,000 CFM of outdoor air across the classrooms and labs
  • Seven DOAS units sized to condition and distribute all required airflow
  • Estimated DOAS package cost: $600,000
  • Higher long-term operating and maintenance costs due to significant outdoor air conditioning
  • Increased energy consumption in peak cooling conditions

VRP often leads to larger DOAS equipment, especially in schools where classroom ventilation requirements scale rapidly. In short, the VRP resulted in a high-cost, high-enthalpy design that strained budget feasibility.

Applying the Indoor Air Quality Procedure (IAQP) with smartIAQ systems

Once IAQP was considered, the engineering team modeled contaminant loads and filtration performance using smartIAQ systems. This revealed that IAQP could safely and compliantly reduce outdoor air requirements by 65 to 70 percent, enabling a radically simpler and lower-cost mechanical design.

The revised IAQP-based design significantly reduced the capacity of all DOAS units. Proposed smartIAQ scope:

  • 24 smartIAQ GridSet™ Pro systems providing in-ceiling, in-space air cleaning for classroom ventilation.
  • Six smartIAQ Distributed systems delivering zone-level, in-room air cleaning to support IAQP performance across shared areas and labs.

One smartIAQ Centralized system providing high-capacity side stream air cleaning to reduce outdoor air requirements and strengthen IAQP compliance for the entire school.

Estimated total smartIAQ cost: $80,000.

The engineering team determined that the smartIAQ-supported IAQP design fully met contaminant control requirements while significantly lowering both first costs and operational costs. As a result, the district is now strongly considering IAQP and smartIAQ as a VE alternative for the project.

Project Impact

The IAQP approach significantly outperformed VRP by reducing outdoor air requirements, dramatically reducing DOAS capacity, and lowering lifecycle energy use.

  HVAC Coil on Unit 3 HVAC Coil on Unit 8
Bacteria CFU/in2 Mold-Fungi CFU/in2 Bacteria CFU/in2 Mold-Fungi CFU/in2
Swab 1 30,000,000 650,000 900,000  3,400,000
Swab 2 20,000,000 500,000 20,000,000 2,800,000
Swab 3 3,100,000 3,500,000 40,000,000 30,000,000
Average 17,700,000 1,550,000 20,300,000 12,066,667
Chart highlighting capital savings of $390,000 when using the IAQP vs. the Ventilation Rate Procedure.

Conclusion

This Texas school project demonstrates the significant impact IAQP can have in K-12 school environments, where VRP based ventilation requirements often drive higher capacity equipment and strain already tight project budgets.

By using smartIAQ to implement an ASHRAE 62.1 Standard-based IAQP design rather than defaulting to VRP, the engineering team reduced outdoor air requirements, radically reduced all DOAS capacity, simplified installation, and unlocked nearly $400,000 in capital savings, as well as an estimated $17,000 - $20,000 in energy cost savings annually.

For school districts evaluating alternatives to complex high-capacity systems or seeking cost-effective compliance with ASHRAE 62.1, IAQP provides a clear and proven path. With lower first cost, reduced energy consumption, and a leaner, more flexible mechanical design, IAQP and smartIAQ can provide a powerful alternative for school districts seeking high-performance ventilation and indoor air quality without the excessive capital cost burden.

Questions?